Table of Contents
A $5 million professional services firm can look healthy right up until you ask one uncomfortable question:
What happens to the revenue if the partners leave?
That is where professional services commercial performance gets interesting.
The firm can have good clients. Good people. Strong expertise. Revenue coming in.
But if most of that revenue exists because a few partners have spent years building personal relationships, we have something different than we think we have.
We have revenue.
We may not have much of an asset.
That was the problem inside one $5 million professional services firm. The partners generated most of the revenue through relationships that probably would not survive their departure. Their pipeline was informal. Proposals were individually written. There was no consistent structure. And account management mostly consisted of whatever client interaction happened naturally through the partners.
None of those things prevented the firm from making money.
Together, though, they created a very different problem.
The business depended on specific people to keep making that money.
Professional Services Sales Performance Starts With the Relationship
Professional services firms sell expertise, which creates an unusual commercial challenge.
The buyer often cannot fully evaluate what they are buying before they buy it. There is personal risk involved in the decision. And because of that, the relationship becomes one of the most important commercial assets in the company.
That is why partner relationships work so well.
It is also why they can become dangerous.
We naturally reward the partner who can bring in another account through a relationship they have built over 15 years. Of course we do. That relationship produces revenue.
But there is a difference between a relationship that belongs to a partner and a relationship that belongs to the firm.
The first produces income today.
The second has a much better chance of surviving a change in ownership.
That distinction became the center of the work.
The Pipeline Cannot Live Inside Someone’s Head
One of the first changes was simple: create a shared pipeline in the CRM with stage criteria everyone on the commercial team understood.
It does not sound dramatic.
It was still necessary.
An informal pipeline works surprisingly well when the right person is carrying the information around in their head. They know which prospect is serious. They remember who needs a follow-up. They understand which proposal is likely to close.
The problem shows up when we try to separate the performance of the company from the individual.
If the commercial system only works because one person remembers everything, there really is not much of a system.
Professional services commercial performance becomes much easier to understand when the pipeline is visible, shared, and based on criteria the team understands rather than the judgment of one partner.
The same issue existed with proposals.
Each proposal was individually written with no consistent structure. So the firm created a standard proposal format built around three things: the client’s situation, the recommended approach, and the expected outcome.
Again, nothing complicated.
Just repeatable.
Professional Services Sales Performance Does Not End When the Proposal Closes
A lot of commercial attention goes toward winning the client.
The case showed another weakness after the sale.
There was no real account management programme beyond the partners’ normal client interactions.
That meant the same dependency that existed in sales continued once the client was inside the firm.
So they introduced a quarterly review cycle for the top 15 clients.
This is where we can miss the bigger issue if we only look at new business.
Professional services commercial performance is not just about how many proposals close. It is also about what happens to the relationships we already earned.
In this case, net revenue retention moved from 91% to 97%.
That is meaningful because the firm was not simply becoming better at winning work. It was becoming better at keeping and managing the commercial value already inside the business.
The Bigger Shift Was Ownership of the Client
The most important change may have been the least visible one.
Commercial accountability was restructured so that client relationships sat with the firm rather than individual partners.
Think about what that changes.
A partner can still have a strong relationship with a client. We do not want to eliminate that.
But the company can no longer depend entirely on that relationship remaining attached to one person.
There is a big difference between saying, “These clients work with our firm,” and admitting, “These clients work with Jim, and Jim happens to work here.”
Buyers notice that difference.
In this case, they eventually paid for it.
Over 18 months, the proposal win rate increased from 28% to 41%.
NRR moved from 91% to 97%.
Revenue per partner increased 22%.
And when the company eventually transacted, the multiple was 6.2x EBITDA.
A previous buyer approach had been 3.8x.
The primary reason given for that improvement was that the business had demonstrably reduced its commercial dependency on specific individuals.
Revenue Is Only Part of What We Are Building
This is the piece I think owners can miss.
We naturally spend years trying to increase revenue. More clients. Better sales. More production from the partners.
And all of that matters.
But if growth makes the company more dependent on the same handful of people, we can increase income without fixing the underlying commercial weakness.
The $5 million firm did not solve this problem with some massive reinvention.
They standardized proposals.
They made the pipeline visible.
They reviewed major clients consistently.
They moved ownership of client relationships toward the firm.
Then they did it long enough that the results could be demonstrated.
That is the part that matters.
Professional services commercial performance is not just a sales question.
It eventually becomes an ownership question.
Because one day somebody will look past the revenue and ask where those relationships actually live.
Inside the company?
Or inside the people who are planning to leave it?
The answer can be worth several turns of EBITDA.
Justin D Maxwell provides family office and investment bank services to the lower midmarket to founders who want 8 or 9 figure net worths. You can learn more here: www.justindmaxwell.com or take our free assessment here: https://fielding.global/articles/diagnostic.html