Table of Contents
Sales target setting looks simple from the outside.
Pick the revenue number. Divide it across the team. Tell everyone what they need to hit.
But that is usually where the problem starts.
I’ve seen founder-led businesses where the process is basically this:
“We need $10 million.”
“Your number is $2 million.”
“Go.”
Maybe the number feels ambitious. Maybe it sounds reasonable. Maybe it represents the growth the founder wants.
But wanting the number and building a sales system capable of producing the number are two different things.
Set the target too low and the team can hit it while still underperforming.
Push it too far and people stop believing it. Then you start seeing demoralisation, excuses, or people gaming the number.
Good sales target setting has to sit somewhere between those two extremes. The target should be challenging, achievable, and tied directly to what the business actually needs to produce.
Sales Target Setting Should Start With the Business Plan
A lot of founders start with the revenue number.
“We want to do $10 million next year.”
Then they divide that number across the sales team and call those individual targets.
The better process works backward.
Start with the EBITDA plan.
How much revenue does the business need to produce for that plan to work?
Then keep going.
How much of that revenue needs to come from new customers?
How much needs to come from existing customer growth?
What does that require from the pipeline?
What conversion rates have to happen?
And finally, what does each salesperson need to produce for the overall plan to be achievable?
That is the difference between assigning a quota and doing sales target setting properly.
The number should come out of the commercial plan.
It should not be the thing the plan is built around.
By the time we arrive at an individual’s target, we should be able to explain exactly where it came from.
The business needs this much revenue.
That requires this much new customer acquisition and growth from existing customers.
That requires this much pipeline at these conversion rates.
Therefore, this is what each team member needs to produce.
Now the number has context.
People perform differently when they understand how their target connects to the business instead of receiving a quota with no explanation behind it.
Why Sales Targets Need Context
There is another reason the number has to make sense.
Accountability becomes much harder when it doesn’t.
If I tell someone they need to produce $2 million, I should be able to explain why $2 million is the right number.
If I cannot, what happens when they miss it?
Was the salesperson actually underperforming?
Was the target unrealistic?
Was there enough pipeline?
Were the expected conversion rates achievable?
If the founder started with an arbitrary number, those questions become difficult to answer.
And once the founder starts doubting whether the number was fair, the accountability conversation gets much harder.
That is why sales target setting affects more than forecasting.
It affects the way the team is managed.
Poor Sales Target Setting Creates an Accountability Problem
I’ve seen this pattern repeatedly.
A salesperson misses their target.
Then they miss it again.
Two or three quarters go by.
The founder knows there is a problem, but the conversation keeps getting pushed off.
Sometimes the person is likeable.
Sometimes they’re a friend.
Sometimes the founder simply is not sure the target was fair in the first place.
That last one matters.
If the target was not tied back to pipeline, conversion, customer acquisition, and the broader business plan, the founder is now trying to enforce a standard they are not completely confident in themselves.
So the underperformance continues.
And the cost does not stop with the person missing the number.
The high performers are watching.
They see someone consistently underperform without anything meaningful changing.
Eventually they start to understand what the business actually rewards.
If strong performance and repeated underperformance lead to the same outcome, the performance standard stops carrying much weight.
Some of those high performers leave.
That is where avoiding the conversation becomes expensive.
We think we are protecting the relationship with one person.
Instead, we are communicating something to the entire team.
Sales Accountability Should Start With the Data
Accountability does not need to be punitive.
It should look much more like an honest pipeline review.
What does the data show?
What does it mean?
What needs to change?
That is the conversation.
When sales target setting is grounded in the actual business plan, those conversations become much cleaner.
You know why the target exists.
You know what pipeline volume was required.
You know what conversion rates were expected.
You know what the business needed the person to produce.
Now you can compare actual performance against a standard that everyone understands.
Handled well, that creates clarity and commitment.
Avoided long enough, it creates confusion and resentment.
Eventually the standard starts to erode because the team learns that missing it does not lead to any meaningful response.
Good Sales Target Setting Makes Performance Measurable
Founders spend a lot of time thinking about the revenue number they want the sales team to hit.
The better question is whether you can defend how you arrived at that number.
Can you trace the target backward to the revenue required by the business plan?
Can you connect that revenue to new customer acquisition and growth from existing customers?
Can you show the pipeline volume and conversion rates required to produce it?
Can each person on the team understand why their number is their number?
If the answer is yes, sales target setting becomes more than handing out quotas.
You have created a performance standard the team can understand.
Then you have to manage against it.
Because you can build the right revenue plan, calculate the right pipeline, and set a completely defensible target.
But if someone repeatedly misses it and nothing happens, the team still gets the message.
The standard only matters if you are willing to enforce it.
Justin D Maxwell provides family office and investment bank services to the lower midmarket to founders who want 8 or 9 figure net worths. You can learn more here: www.justindmaxwell.com or take our free assessment here: https://fielding.global/articles/diagnostic.html